The next chapter in No
Choirboy is an interview with the brother and mother of Napoleon Beazley,
who was a seventeen-year-old boy that was executed for killing the father of a
federal judge. This case sparked national debate whether sentencing kids under
the age of 18 was right. Napoleon was known as a great kid in his town. He was
the class president, captain of the football team, and a very popular guy.
Everybody seemed to like him. Is it right to have a kid who is seventeen
sentenced to death for one bad mistake he or she has made?
I know that minors can no longer be charged capital
punishment but this scenario with Napoleon got me thinking. I am against the
death penalty by all means but I tired to put myself in a position where I was
for the death penalty. Then I thought about whether minors should be sentenced to
death or not. I put a lot of thought into this and it was really hard to make a
decision. I keep thinking that everybody, regardless of age, should be responsible
for his or her decision. The other side of me kept saying that kids brains are
not 100% developed and because of their immaturity, they can be at fault for
making bad decisions. That side of
me definitely won. Teenagers make bad decisions, it is part of their nature,
but no decision can be bad enough to have them sentenced to death.
No comments:
Post a Comment